Who Said Spamming is Easy Money?

An email spammer was recently fined $11.2 billion:

An Midwest internet service provider was awarded an $11.2 billion judgment against a Florida man for sending millions of unsolicited e-mails advertising mortgage and debt consolidation services.

With a suit like that the spammer might need to take out a second mortgage or secure a reverse mortgage home loan, and then maybe look for ways to consolidate his debt using a debt consolidation loan. If all else fails maybe he can go for a cash advance payday loan or create guaranteed instant wealth using a multilevel marketing system.

But seriously, with that sort of a fine he is going to have to keep spamming to be able to pay it off. Spam your way out of debt...sounds like an ebook :)

- Y! MyWeb

grnffft

Sorry, you made me spill my drink.

US claims are a bit OTT though, dontchathink? Are US lawyers like dutch used car salesmen? As in: aim high and try and meet in the middle ($5.6bn sounds a lot more reasonable no?)

In any case I'm glad my keyboard is snort-proof.......


The Eagles:

"The lure of easy money has a very strong appeal."

(I'd link to it, but they have one of those auto-everything all Flash sites.)

At any rate, I think it's always good to factor in *everything* to do with whatever one wants to do -- which makes the less-than-legal less than appealing. Or should, but it seems that there are those who can't seem to wrap their wits around that thought.


Wasn't actually a fine ...

... it was a judgement in a civil action.

The lawsuit said the defendants used the cis.net domain in the e-mails as part of a false return address to disguise their source and deflect complaints to CIS.

Kramer claimed that under state law he was entitled to $10 per illegal e-mail but didn't expect to receive any of the judgment money.

And they emphasise that spam is not illegal - it was the false statements that made the case.