Google Buying FeedBurner for $100 Million?
ValleyWag says they have confirmed Sam Sethi's post that Google is buying FeedBurner and that the price is in the $100 Million range. So, why would Google pay such a high multiple, about 10 times revenues, for the startup?
Quote:
Probably, for the same reason it has developed Google Analytics: it is another way for Google to tie in independent online publishers. Feedburner provides an array of services to sites, such as email newsletter publishing, and the integration of external news and photos.
- 0 agreed / 0 disagreed
- Login or register to post comments
User login
Follow Threadwatch
Editors
*Active* Threadwatch Editors
Joe Hall
Steve Peron
Gabriel aka @Gabs
Bill Hartzer
Ann Smarty
Barry Welford
Gail Gardner
Laura Crest
Steve Gerencser
Comments
Not to mention, as blogs get
Not to mention, as blogs get more and more aggressive with nepotistic links, paid links, automated content creation, etc. this might be a way for Google to understand what they should trust from that part of the web graph a bit better.
Even if they didn't profit at all from Feedburner, I have to think that having another source of data for a non-link based web graph (to create algorithms to filter and flag the link based web graph) is a significant strategic value.
Visitors = Dollars
Aggregating data from all their resources, while it would eventually turn into a worthwhile effort, isn't a reason to spend that kind of money.
The key to ruling the web is having a wide variety of visitors that you can target market or otherwise monetize. Feedburner has a wide array of visitors from as many different markets as you can imagine and their market position is such that their value will increase exponentially as the use of RSS gradually spreads.
They bought Feedburner for the customer base. It was a smart move - even if they did overpay. I doubt they will be handing over cash at the time of sale anyways.
seobook is right
Having another tie in to your content gives google search another advantage over the competition. I wouldn't be surprised if blog spam is the fastest growing type of spam, and controlling feedburner gives Google an insiders view of your blog.
Google will eventually have a copy of all your data, why fight the inevitable?
Google already has
Feedburner's customer base. They bought it for the data.
Think they could use
Think they could use subscriber numbers as a quality signal?
Between Google Reader users
Between Google Reader users and Feedburner they would have the best measure of signal to noise in the blog vertical.
How many blogs actually use
How many blogs actually use Feedburner, though, as a percentile? I would have thought Feedburner and Google Reader will still only provide a fraction of the data required to determine blog readership & quality factors.
They don't need 100%
They don't need 100% coverage, and those blogs with large reach are more likely to be using Feedburner and are more likely to be subscribed to many times via Google Reader.
Arrington says the deal is confirmed
The rumors:
TechCrunch link